MENJADIKAN STEM MEMUNGKINKAN DI TINGKAT SMA: STUDI REDUKSI-DIDAKTIK KONTEKS ORGANIC-LED UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA SEKOLAH
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Penguasaan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi (IPTEK) saat ini menjadi kunci penting dalam menghadapi tantangan di masa depan. Pendekatan STEM merupakan salah satu tren pendidikan saat ini yang dapat menjembatani penguasaan IPTEK bagi generasi muda. Namun tentunya, pendekatan ini membawa konsekuensi, yakni perlunya memodifikasi kurikulum konvensional menjadi kurikulum berbasis konteks. Studi ini berfokus pada proses reduksi didaktik konteks OLED pada mata pelajaran Kimia SMA. OLED dipilih karena merepresentasikan integrasi sains, teknologi, teknik dan matematika, merupakan tema penelitian yang kekinian, bersifat terbarukan dan dekat dengan keseharian siswa. Studi ini menggunakan model MER untuk merekonstruksi struktur konten saintifik OLED menjadi struktur konten yang memungkinkan untuk pembelajaran di tingkat SMA melalui proses reduksi didaktik. Hasil studi ini mengungkapkan empat cara reduksi didaktik topik OLED yaitu kembali ke tahap kualitatif; pengabaian; penggunaan penjelasan berupa gambar; dan penggunaan tingkat perkembangan sejarah. Hasil studi ini diharapkan dapat menjadi salah satu referensi konten kurikulum berbasis konteks untuk diterapkan dalam pendidikan berbasis STEM.
Kata kunci: STEM, kimia, Organic-LED, reduksi didaktik
Â
Â
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, the mastery of science and technology is an important key for facing global challenges in the future. STEM approach is one of the current educational trends that are able to bridge this issue. However, this approach brings consequence, which is the need to modify the conventional curriculum into a context-based curriculum. This study focused on the process of didactic reduction of the OLED context for high school chemistry. OLED was chosen because it represents the integration between science, technology, engineering and mathematics. This study used Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER) to reconstruct the scientific content structure of OLED including its definition,components, characteristics and working principle into an appropriate content structure for high school instruction. The result of this study shows four ways of didactic reduction of OLED context, i.e. return to qualitative step, neglection, the use of image descriptions and the use of historical developmental levels. The result of the study is expected to be one of the curriculum contents referencethat can be used in STEM-based high school instruction.
Keywords: STEM, chemistry, Organic-LED, didactical reductionFull Text:
PDFReferences
Adisendjaja, Y. H. (2009). Analisis buku ajar biologi SMA kelas X di kota Bandung berdasarkan literasi sains. Bandung: FPMIPA-Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Anggraini, F. I. & Huzaifah, S. (2017). Implementasi STEM dalam pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA: STEM untuk Pembelajaraan Sains Abad 21, Palembang, 722-731.
Anwar, S. (2010). Pengolahan bahan ajar. Handout perkuliahan [tidak diterbitkan].
Arifin & Anwar, S. (2015). Pengembangan bahan ajar IPA Terpadu tema udara melalui Four Steps Teaching Material Development. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2 (1), 1-11.
Asmuniv. (2015). Diklat Guru Profesional Integrasi STEM. PPPTK VEDC, Malang.
Banerji, A.,Tausch, M, W., & Scherf, U. (2013). Classroom experiments and teaching materials on OLEDs with semiconducting polymer. Educ. quÃm.,24,17-22.
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N. & Melton, M. (2011). STEM. Georgetown University Center on Education and The Workforce.
Cooney, S. & Bottoms, G. (2003). Middle Grades to high school: Mending a weak link (Report No. EA-032-691). Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 479785).
Dewi, K., Sadia, I. W. & Ristiati, N. P. (2013). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA Terpadu dengan setting inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan kinerja ilmiah siswa. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, 3.
Duit, R.,Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M. & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction – A framework for improving teaching and learning science. Sci. Educ. Res. and Pract. in Europe:Retrospective and Prospective, 5, hlm. 13–37.
Firman, H. (2015). Pendidikan Sains berbasis STEM: Konsep, pengembangan dan peranan riset pascasarjana. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA dan PLKH Universitas Pakuan, Agustus 2015.
Grillenberger, A., Przybylla, M. & Romeike, R. (2016). Bringing CS innovations to the classroom: A process model of educational reconstruction. Proceeding International Conference on Informatics in Schools ISSEP 2016, Münster, Germany.
Gropengiesser, H. (1997). Student`s conceptions of vision. Journal of Science Education, 3 (1), 71-87.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan Penyusunan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah dan Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
Laherto, A. (2012). Nanoscience education for scientific literacy: Opportunities and challenges in secondary school and in out-of-school settings. (Disertasi). Faculty of Science of the University of Helsinki.
Listyawati, M. (2012). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran IPA Terpadu di SMP. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 1 (1), 61-69.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B. & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies, Melbourne, Vic.
Marks, M., Stuckey, M., Belova, N & Eilks. I. (2014). The societal dimension in German science education – From tradition towards selected cases and recent developments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10 (4), 285-296.
Mitschke, U & Bäuerle, P. (2000). The electroluminescence of organic materials. J.Mater. Chem., 10, 1471-1507.
Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM Education monograph series: Attributes of STEM Education. Baltimore: TIES (Teaching Institutes for Essential Science).
Nentwig, P., Parchmann, I., Demuth, R., Gräsel, C., & Ralle, B. (2002). Chemie im Context-From situated learning in relevant contexts to a systematic development of basic chemical concepts. Makalah Simposium Internasional IPN-UYSEG, Kiel Jerman.
Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). The model of educational reconstruction: A fremework for the design of theory-based content specific interventions. The example of climate change. In T. P. Nieven, Educational design research - Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 513-531). Enashede, Netherlands: SLO.
Pereira, L. (2012). Organic Light Emitting-Diodes: The use of rare-earth and transition metal (Taylor & Francis Group).
Riemeier, T., & Gropengiesser, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students`conceptual development in teaching experiments. International Journal of Science Education. , 30 (7), 923-939.
Roberts, A. (2012). A Justification for STEM Education. Technology and engineering teacher, 74 (8), 1-5.
Sam, A., Hanson, R., Niebert, K. & Kwarteng, T. (2015). The Model of Educational Reconstruction: Scientists’ and students’ conceptual balances to improve teaching of coordination chemistry in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection,7 (5), 67-77.
Sholahuddin, A. (2011). Pengembangan buku ajar kimia kelas X Berbasis reduksi didaktik: Uji kelayakan di SMA negeri kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 17 (2), 166-177.
Suhery, T. (2017). Implementasi STEM pada pembelajaran kimia dalam rangka menerapkan kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA: STEM untuk Pembelajaran SAINS Abad 21, Palembang, 8-13.
Tsujimura, T. (2012). OLED Display: Fundamentals and applications. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Wang, H., Moore, T., Roehrig, G. & Park, M. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptionsand practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1-13.
Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S. & Koes H, S. (2016). STEM: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana. Pros. Semnas. Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1, 976-984.
Zabel, J., & Gropengiesser, H. (2011). Learning progress in evolution theory: climbing a ladder or roaming a landscape? Journal of Biological Education, 45 (3), 143-149.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/be.v4i2.1598
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
![Lisensi Creative Commons](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Bio Educatio (The Journal of Science and Biology Education) is lisenced under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.
Â