THE EXISTING ROLES OF LITERACY TEACHERS IN THE ERA OF MULTILITERACIES: A SOCIOCULTURAL PERSPECTIVES

Rama Dwika Herdiawan

Abstract


Abstract. Literacy is defined traditonally as ‘the  ability  to  read  and  write’  and it is also regarded as the ability to understand every single iinformation in different contexts or fields. Nevertheless,  the  new  literacy  approach  in the point of view of  the  post-structuralism  covers  the  representation of   texts  in  context,  different values,  meanings  and  the  principles  of  multiliteracies.  Traditional and modern concepts of literacy have correlation with a number of sociocultural activities which occurs in the in the society as well as the classroom which represents a social space. This study focuses on explaining the term  literacy  and  multiliteracies  in  the  postmodern  world  and  also  the existing roles  of  literacy  teachers  for  the  practical activities  in  Indonesian literacy classrooms. 

Keywords: Literacy Teachers, Multiliteracies, Sociocultural Perspectives


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvermann, D.E., & McLean, C.A. (2007). The nature of literacies. In L.S. Rush, A.J. Eakle, & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practice (pp. 1–20). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Beach, R., & Myers, J. (2001). Inquiry-based English instruction: Engaging students in life and literature. New York: Teachers College Press. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-306). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan Publishing. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury.

Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.).London: Taylor & Francis.

Gee, J.P. (2000). Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 195–207). Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Giroux, H.A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical padagogy of learning. Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.

Giroux, H.A. (1992). Border-crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.

Goodman, Y.M., & Goodman, K.S. (1990). Vygotsky in a whole-language perspective. L.C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education (pp. 223-250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Herdiawan, R. D., Saleh, M., & Warsono, D. S. (2020, February). School Literacy Improvement Efforts in a State Junior High School. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019) (pp. 543-551). Atlantis Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/jell.v5i2.3355

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by: 

     

 

Organized by the Department of English Leanguage Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, the University of Majalengka

Address : Jln. K.H. Abdul Halim No. 103 Majalengka 45418, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

email : admiljell@unma.ac.id

Creative Commons License
Journal of English Language Learning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Â