PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES ARGUMENTASI TULISAN YANG BERORIENTASI E-LEARNING UNTUK MELATIH KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI MAHASISWA
Abstract
Pembelajaran mata kuliah Mikrobiologi di Jurusan Pendidikan IPA FKIP Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa selama ini lebih sering dengan ceramah. Hal ini tidak efektif mengkonstruksi pengetahuan mahasiswa sebagai calon guru IPA dan belum mampu merangsang keterampilan argumentasinya. Oleh sebab itu, perlu diperbaiki menggunakan e-learning agar mahasiswa berperan aktif mengkonstruksi pengetahuannya dan memaksimalkan keterampilan argumentasi secara tertulis (tulisan). Tujuan penelitian untuk mengembangkan instrumen tes argumentasi tulisan yang berorientasi e-learning untuk melatih keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian dan pengembangan terdiri dari 7 tahapan yaitu menganalisis kebutuhan, merencanakan, mengembangkan produk awal, melakukan validasi produk awal, merevisi produk awal, melakukan uji coba kelompok kecil dan merevisi produk. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA semester V sebanyak 37 orang. Hasil validasi ahli menunjukkan bahwa instrumen tes argumentasi tulisan yang berorientasi e-learning pada mata kuliah Mikrobiologi yang dikembangkan dikategorikan sangat valid dengan melihat sebaran ketiga aspek penilaian. Hal ini terlihat pada aspek konstruksi dan aspek materi kategorinya sangat valid serta aspek bahasa dikategorikan valid artinya instrumen tes layak digunakan untuk diujicobakan.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acar, O & Patton, B.R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skills in an Argumentation based Guided inquiry course. Social and Behavioral Science. Vol. 46, pp. 4756-4760.
Bulgern, J.A., Ellis, J.D. & Marquis, J.G. (2014). The Used and Effectiveness of an Argumentation and evaluation intervention in science classes. Journal Science Education Technology. Vol. 23, No.1, pp. 82-97.
Carin, A., & Sund, B. (1997). Teaching Science Through Discovery. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Publishing Co.
Demircioglu, T & Ucar, S. (2012). The Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry on Preservice Science Teacher’s Attitude and Argumentation Skill. Social and Behavioral Science. Vol. 46, pp. 5035-5039.
Erduran, S, Ozdem, Y & Park, J.Y. (2015). Research Trends on Argumentation in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education. Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 1-12.
Faiqoh, N., Khasanah, N., Astuti, L.P., Prayitno, R., Prayitno, B.A. (2018). Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas X dan XI MIPA di SMA Batik 1 Surakarta pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. Vol. 7, No.3, pp. 174 – 182.
Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M. & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation Versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom. Informal Logic Journal. Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 417-446.
Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., Villarroel, C., Gilabert, S. (2015). Arguing Collaboratively: Argumentative Discourse Types and Their Potential for Knowledge Building. British Journal of Educational Psychology, pp. 1-15.
Frydenberg, M.E. & Andone, D. (2011). Learning for 21st Century Skills. IEEE’s International Conference on Information Society, pp. 314-318.
Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction. 8th ed. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S. & Felton, M. (2013). The Effect of Argumentative Task Goal on The Quality of Argumentative Discourse. Science Education Journal. Vol. 97, No. 4, pp. 497-523.
Gilabert , S., Garcia-Mila, M. & Felton, M.K. 2012. The Effect of Task Instructions on Students’ Use of Repetition in Argumentative discourse. International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1-22.
Gray, E. & Nam-Hwa, K. (2014). The structure of scientific Arguments by Secondary Science Teachers: Comparison of Experimental and Historical Science Topics. International Journal of Science Education. 36 (1), 46-65.
Iordanou, K. (2010). Developing argument skills across scientific and social domains. Journal of Cognition and Development. 11 (3), 293-327
Jin, H., Hokayem., S. Wang, S. and X. Wei. (2015). A US-China Interview Study: Biology Students’ Argumentation and Explanation About Energy Consumption Issues. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 301-318.
Kind, P.M., Hofstein, A., Kind, V., Wilson, J. (2014). Peer Argumentation in The School Science Laboratory – Exploring Effects of Task Features. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 33, pp. 2527-2558.
Koenenman, M., Goedhart, M. & Ossevoort, M. (2013). Introducing Preuniversity Students to Primary Scientific Literatur Through Argumentation Analysis. Research Science Education. Vol. 43, pp. 2009-2034.
Kulatunga, U., Moog, R.S. & Lewis, J.E. (2013). Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-led Sessions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 50, No. 10, pp. 1207-1231.
Lang, H. R. & Evans, D.N. (2006). Models, Strategies, and Methods for Effective Teaching. USA: Pearson Education Inc.
Macagno, A, & Konstantinidou, A. (2012). What Students’ Arguments Can Tell Us Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 225-243.
Nazarudin. (2007). Manajemen Pembelajaran: Implementasi Konsep, Karakteristik dan Metodologi Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Umum. Yogyakarta: Teras
Nieveen, N. (1999). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nussbaum, E. M. (2011). Argumentation, Dialogue Theory, and Probability Modeling: Alternative Frameworks for Argumentation Research in Education. Educational Psychologist Journal. Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 84-106.
Polat, H. & Emre, F.B. (2020). The Effect of Argumentation Method on Critical Thinking Tendency, Logical Thinking Abilities and Academic Achievement of Science Teacher Candidates. European Journal of Education Studies. Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 210-227.
Prasetyo, Z.K, Senam, Wilujeng, I, Anjarsari, P, Wibowo, W.S, Putri, R.A, Katriani, L, Ariyati., D, Wardani, Y.R, Khoirunnisa, O.A, Firdausi, I.R.A. dan Hardina, M. (2013). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Sains Terpadu untuk Meningkatkan Kognitif, Keterampilan Proses, Kreativitas serta Menerapkan Konsep Ilmiah Peserta Didik SMP. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Putri, R.E. 2016. Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP Kelas VII Melalui Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu dengan Tema HALO pada Topik Kalor. Tesis.
Republik Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No. 65 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Sekretariat Negara, Jakarta.
Sampson, V & Blanchard, M.R. (2012). Science teachers and scientific argumentation: trends in views and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 49, No. 9, pp. 1122–1148.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J. Walker, J.P. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as A Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments : an Exploratory Study. Science Education Journal. Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 217-257.
Sugiyono, M. (2008). Penelitian Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 124.
Swanson, L.H., Bianchini, J.A., Lee, J.S. (2014). Engaging in Argument and Communicating Information: A Case Study of English Language Learners and Their Science Teacher in An Urban High School. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 31-64.
Taufik, A.T. (2018). Penggunaan Model Argument Based Science Inquiry (ABSI) dengan Pendekatan Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) untuk Membangun Kemampuan Berargumentasi dan Keterampilan Komunikasi Siswa SMP pada Tema Pencemaran Lingkungan. Tesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA John Wiley & Sons.
Ural, E., & Gençoğlan, D. M. (2020). The Effect of Argumentation-based Science Teaching Approach on 8th Graders’ Learning in the Subject of Acids-bases, Their Attitudes towards Science Class and Scientific Process Skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-15.
Venville, G.J. & Dawson, V.M. (2010). The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 47, No. 8, pp. 952-977.
Yun, S.M. & Kim, H.B. (2015). Changes in Students’ Participation and Small Group Norms in Scientific Argumentation Article. Research in Science Education Journal. Vol. 45, pp. 465-484.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/be.v6i2.3317
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
![Lisensi Creative Commons](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Bio Educatio (The Journal of Science and Biology Education) is lisenced under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.
Â